But we are also encouraged by the stories of our readers finding help through our site. During these challenging times, we guarantee we will work tirelessly to support you. We will continue to give you accurate and timely information throughout the crisis, and we will deliver on our mission — to help everyone in the world learn how to do anything — no matter what. Thank you to our community and to all of our readers who are working to aid others in this time of crisis, and to all of those who are making personal sacrifices for the good of their communities. We will get through this together.Sincerely,Elizabeth DouglasCEO, wikiHow.

We bought it after a senior partner saw it at an exhibit. He is a techie typeand was impressed as heck with the concept of dragging things around, etc. Wehad just purchased an IBM PC at the time and were trying to load up cogo. Dbasewas in vogue, too.

As far as anyone could tell Autocad on the PC was close touseless, given the processor speed and the limitations of the program. As wellas the outrageous Redraw times, let alone Regen.So it stayed on the shelf for over a year until I loaded it up and attempted todo something real on it. After beating on it for a week I did manage to get apassable picture of an intersection with some construction changes. The cost, ofcourse, was off the chart but we chalked it up to learning.Pretty soon we were up to PC-XT's. I boosted the clock speed to about 12 m witha replacement crystal which the savvy nerd could buy.

Dec 12, 2013  When you enable fast boot function, the computer disallow you enter BIOS by click DEL key while booting. In this demonstration, we'll show you how to enter BIOS with GO2BIOS application. Quadrophenia 和tom waits的精选 真是一种安慰呀！ 就是那种可以让wo静下来的声音 让我的心脏回复正常的速度 让我的眼睛可以安全的闭上 谁人的这专辑一点儿没有狂燥的感觉 海的各种声音迂回于每首歌之间 掺杂着乐器的长段演奏 还有.

Worked pretty well. Weconstantly upgraded Autocad through this version and that and it did improve.One upgrade included a dongle, which was a PITA. We had the program installed ontwo machines - not in order to use it double but in case one machine was in useby someone doing a spreadsheet or something the other would be available.

Nobodythought of computers as special tools for a particular department. There was acomputer room and if you needed to use one you signed up on the schedule.Well, the secretaries went against the above rule.

Before the PC we got them acouple TRS-80s for word processing. The idea was, they could be programmed aswell as being word processors. Never did program them, though.

After a whilethey got PC-Lite's (code named Peanut).Soon, along came Dave Arnold with a cogo integrated into Autocad. DCA was acivil firm nearby and Dave was a pretty smart guy, as was his cohort, Dave.(Damn, I can't remember.) We hopped right on and rode that wave until Civil andLand Desktop, which still uses some of the routines.We did a lot of good work on the systems as they improved. But most of the workup to 1993 or so was still done by hand. Very hard to convince the leadershipthat computer drafting was competitive.Of course They did cave and now the firm is totally cad-ized.

That was after Imoved along to start up a new firm, where I am 1/2 boss and all cadman anddesigner.rs-Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.Checked by AVG anti-virus system (6.0.698 / Virus Database: 455 - Release Date: 6/2/2004. LincolnAutodesk Discussion Group FacilitatorSchmid' wrote in messagenews:40c1e9c03@newsprd01.

Anyone have any insights into what it was like to use AutoCAD 1.0 (1982). Is there any thing published that has the 'features/benefits' through the versions? I think it would be interesting. I've used v10 (on a 25mhz 386 with an added math-coprocessor) through ADT 2004 on a P4/2.4ghz, but as processor speed would indicate, I am not sure if the tool has made us 100 times faster over the last 10 years. Thanks,. I started with v1.2 which Professor Anthony Schanarsky introducedinto the UW-Milwaukee School of Architecture and Urban Planning.I can distinctly remember it was v1.2 because we were all amazedand so impressed when rubber-bands were introduced with theupgrade to v1.3.Two other issues I distinctly recall in those days.

A 10 MB hard drivewas over $2500 and a lame-o using a machine in the lab preventedanybody else from using the machine to do their assignments becauselame brain thought circular arrays produced a 'cool design' that tooknearly the entire weekend to finish calculating. Nobody would talkto him for weeks:-)-<%= Clinton GallagherA/E/C Consulting, Web Design, e-Commerce Software DevelopmentWauwatosa, Milwaukee County, Wisconsin USANET csgallagher@ REMOVETHISTEXT metromilwaukee.comURL Schmid' wrote in messagenews:40c1e9c03@newsprd01. Anyone have any insights into what it was like to use AutoCAD 1.0 (1982). Is there any thing published that has the 'features/benefits' through the versions?

I think it would be interesting. I've used v10 (on a 25mhz 386 with an added math-coprocessor) through ADT 2004 on a P4/2.4ghz, but as processor speed would indicate, I am not sure if the tool has made us 100 times faster over the last 10 years. Thanks,. Hit the enter before finishing. Doh!I started out on 2.17g on an IBM PC 8086 with an 8087 math coprocessor, Ibelieve it had 64K onboard, no hard drive, with (2) 360K floppies. A:/ forthe applications, B:/ for the data. Monochrome monitor, 12x12 digitizerand a Houston-Instruments DMP-52 single pen plotter (for what it's worthstill worked when I donated it last year )I can still remember the first whopping 10MB HD which cost us as much as thePC and when we added a two monitor set-up one for the GRAPHSCR and the otherwas for the TEXTSCR.woohoo.

Now it only took 5 minutes to get to acommand prompt vs 10-Tracy W. LincolnAutodesk Discussion Group Facilitator. As far as anyone could tell Autocad on the PC was close to useless, given the processor speed and the limitations of the program.

Aswell as the outrageous Redraw times, let alone Regen.In the old days, two rules, never regen and under no circumstances have undoenabled.If you had to update the view of something that would require a regen, youjust erased it and then oops it back. With a 20meg hard drive (and nonetwork), you couldn't afford the disk space for undo and besides which, itwas more of a drafting tool and most work was done from mark-ups.With the advent of ram and display list processors, we used to load the dwginto a ram disk and edit it there. Saves were to the hard drive.

It didn'tmake any difference over working from the hard disk because when youcrashed, the temperory files didn't do you any good even if you had accessto them. The display list processor allowed you to use a slide of the floorplan defined in the zoom extents and then you could zoom around, display theslide and it would display the zoomed area of the floor plan and you coulddraw right on top of it.All sorts of workarounds to be productive. With all the new hardware I thinkthat we are now faster but no where near as efficient, just lazy, lettingthe machine do the bull work that with a little thought, we could find a wayto not have to do the bull work to get the same result.

As an example, weused a system of blocks for doing HVAC while in another office theydeveloped a parametric driven duct program which was just as fast but lefteverythng as single lines and arcs. Our blocks came from V9 and the otherprogram was developed for R14.Dave AlexanderKeen Engineering Co. V1.3 on an 8086 processor running at a blinding 0.07Mhz, amber 9' monitor, no HD, 2- 5 1/4' floppy drives. ('Insert Disk #3 in Drive A'). After a while, we added a color monitor and a 1meg hard drive to each of 3 machines.

Whoo hooo, we're in tall cotton now.The boss finally asked what we needed to make this really work. We bought 4 286 machines with 10M hard drives and ran a token ring network to share data. 'We're in heaven'One of the first drawings I worked on was a topo of SouthWest Wyoming. File was nearly a meg, took 6 hours to pull up with 2.0, heavily used VIEWs and BLOCK (with =). So you'll never hear me complain about a slow drawing now. Great stories all-together.Looks like were gettin' old.I started on rel.9 back in 1987 (yes, the previous century).One pc, 286 with 287 co-processor, 10Mb Hard drive, stunning 1MB of memory,dual screen and a tablet.Plots were made on a calcomp 1043GT pen plotter.And all of that at the costs of.

$40,000, wonder if it ever payed back.There even was a time were the 'fast work' was done on the computer and thanthe drawing was 'hand-finished'.The plotter had the annoyancy that the paper went fore- and backwards thusdrying it and shrinking so the lines where it started with would never meetwith the ones it drew later, what a crap if you look back.Memories, memories.Jan'OLD-CADaver' schreef in berichtnews:8611760117.JavaMail.jive@jiveforum1.autodesk.com. V1.3 on an 8086 processor running at a blinding 0.07Mhz, amber 9' monitor,no HD, 2- 5 1/4' floppy drives. ('Insert Disk #3 in Drive A'). After awhile, we added a color monitor and a 1meg hard drive to each of 3 machines.whoo hooo, we're in tall cotton now. The boss finally asked what we needed to make this really work. We bought4 286 machines with 10M hard drives and ran a token ring network to sharedata. 'We're in heaven' One of the first drawings I worked on was a topo of SouthWest Wyoming.File was nearly a meg, took 6 hours to pull up with 2.0, heavily used VIEWsand BLOCK (with =).

So you'll never hear me complain about a slow drawingnow. I started on version 1.2.

I remember drawing the Microsoft headquarterscampus in Redmond Washington. Had to use QTEXT, substitute simplifiedblocks (block = ), and do everything possible to avoid a regen. Even so,just zooming in on another part of the drawing floor plan, took on average20 minutes to REDRAW. I think those of us that experienced the early daysof CAD, know the value of keeping DWGs lean and mean, even today.By the way, AutoCAD 2004 FINALLY upped the default value of VIEWRES from theway-too-low 100, to 1000. We set it to 10000. It is one of my pet peeves,because on most AEC scale work, viewres=100 results in things like doorswings looking like 2-3 segments lines. Tests done on large drawings inR2000i showed that a regen with VIEWRES = 100 or all the way to to 20000,made no significant difference.

And they still have that dumb 'Do you wantfast zooms? Yes/No ' prompt, which doesn't do anything. Has'nt doneanything for a good number of prior releases, but apparently kept thereinfinitely for 'script compatibility'. Just in case you have some 18 yearold scripts hanging around and haven't figured out how to take one line outof the script. It's just one of those AutoCAD relics I guess, like me.-Mark McDonoughSasaki Associateswrote in messagenews:8611760117.JavaMail.jive@jiveforum1.autodesk.com. V1.3 on an 8086 processor running at a blinding 0.07Mhz, amber 9' monitor,no HD, 2- 5 1/4' floppy drives. ('Insert Disk #3 in Drive A').

After awhile, we added a color monitor and a 1meg hard drive to each of 3 machines.whoo hooo, we're in tall cotton now. The boss finally asked what we needed to make this really work.

We bought4 286 machines with 10M hard drives and ran a token ring network to sharedata. 'We're in heaven' One of the first drawings I worked on was a topo of SouthWest Wyoming.File was nearly a meg, took 6 hours to pull up with 2.0, heavily used VIEWsand BLOCK (with =). So you'll never hear me complain about a slow drawingnow.

For in-depth reading on the development of AutoCAD see:didn't start with AutoCAD until R9, Before that was a CAD package calledProDesign. It has a virtual screen equal to the page size you set.

Therewere 4 views available each equal to 1/4 of the virtual screen. The firstwas dead center the others were the 4 quadrants. So to start atthe end of an existing line you had to list the line and type in thecoordinates as the start point.Before that we had an interesting way to do drawings. We had a COGO packagethat only had a command line and batch file interface. But itcould address an HP pen plotter.

All the line work was written out in batchfiles. Notes were in separate ASCII files and were placed by referencing thefile and describing the position of the note relative to the corner of thepaper.

We used pen colors too. The plotter had a tray of technical pens. Italso had one that held colored markers. Line weights were controlled bywhich pen it actually drew with. For check plots we'd plot with the coloredmarker pens.

The same way you might know what lineweight would be plotted bythe color, we knew which pen would be used. The final was done with the inkpens on mylar. Keeping those pens clean was a chore.

If they cloggedduring a plot it was garbage. Detail not handled by COGO linework, boundarytext or notes were then hand drafted on the mylar.Before that was a command line COGO package that plotted points to tractorfeed paper with registration marks so a worksheet could be taped together.And before that was a Wang programmable calculator that typed outcoordinates on a modified IBM Selectric typewriter.

Then those were plottedby hand. A lot of work was also done on HP handheld calculators, the 29C.We've come a ways.Allen'joeself' wrote in messagenews:326625456601.JavaMail.jive@jiveforum2. learned on 2.62. 1st job was on an 8088 and acad came on 360's.

I had the 1042GT at my 2nd job. 386 1mb ram 40 mb hd. And bragged about it. How 'bout when icon menus came out with r9. I had a paceseter 2036 at the next place.

View and Download Canon IR5000 service manual online. IR5000 All in One Printer pdf manual download. Also for: Ir6000. Canon offers a wide range of compatible supplies and accessories that can enhance your user experience with you imageRUNNER 6000 that you can purchase direct. Scroll down to easily select items to add to your shopping cart for a faster, easier checkout. Visit the Canon Online Store. Canon ir 6000 service manual free: software free download. We use cookies to provide you with the best possible experience in your interactions with Canon and on our website – find out more about our use of Cookies and change your cookie settings here.You agree to our use of cookies on your device by continuing to use our website or by clicking I Accept. Download CANON IR5000 IR6000 SM service manual & repair info for electronics experts. Service manuals, schematics, eproms for electrical technicians. This site helps you to save the Earth from electronic waste! CANON IR5000 IR6000 SM. Click on the link for free download!

It could lay a 36x48 sheetstraight out at full speed on check plots and roller balls. Fianl plots were1-2 hrs then, and we complain that the inkjets aren't fast enough now. Joe Selfridge.

In R11 they introduced a great timesaving command. It still works in 2004although it isn't documented. That will zoom you out to theextents of the current virtual screen.

Which means that you are zoomed outas far as you can go without a Regen. That way you could tell if you couldsee the area you wanted to work on without regenning and plan accordingly.Allen'Mark McDonough' wrote in messagenews:40c4b3b41@newsprd01.

I started on version 1.2. I remember drawing the Microsoft headquarters campus in Redmond Washington. Had to use QTEXT, substitute simplified blocks (block = ), and do everything possible to avoid a regen. Even so, just zooming in on another part of the drawing floor plan, took on average 20 minutes to REDRAW.

I think those of us that experienced the early days of CAD, know the value of keeping DWGs lean and mean, even today. By the way, AutoCAD 2004 FINALLY upped the default value of VIEWRES fromthe way-too-low 100, to 1000. We set it to 10000. It is one of my petpeeves, because on most AEC scale work, viewres=100 results in things like door swings looking like 2-3 segments lines.

Tests done on large drawings in R2000i showed that a regen with VIEWRES = 100 or all the way to to 20000, made no significant difference. And they still have that dumb 'Do youwant fast zooms? Yes/No ' prompt, which doesn't do anything. Has'nt done anything for a good number of prior releases, but apparently kept there infinitely for 'script compatibility'. Just in case you have some 18year old scripts hanging around and haven't figured out how to take one lineout of the script. It's just one of those AutoCAD relics I guess, like me. Mark McDonough Sasaki Associates http://www.sasaki.com.

There was also the VSMAX and VSMIN system variables. We made menu macrosthat used these two variables to do a virtual max zoom. Not sure whenVSMAX/VSMIN arrived on the AutoCAD scene; the link on AutoCAD's website fortheir release history only goes back to R12.-Mark McDonoughSasaki AssociatesJessup' wrote in messagenews:40c4b7c11@newsprd01. In R11 they introduced a great timesaving command. It still works in 2004 although it isn't documented. That will zoom you out to the extents of the current virtual screen.

Which means that you are zoomed out as far as you can go without a Regen. That way you could tell if you could see the area you wanted to work on without regenning and plan accordingly. Allen. (IMHO) pior to v2.18 the various PC CAD offerings of the day competed onfeatures (limited) and speed (abysmal) and I salute the real pioneers!Autodesk accommodated the then more varied hardware market.

We picked theNEC APC III for comparative speed and an excellent display:machine was partially IBM PC compatible, but neither the PC bus or BIOSwere cloned. It had an NEC 7220 graphics chip which was not directly CGAcompatible, but was much higher resolution, and quite fast for its day. TheCPU is an 8086 running at 8 MHz with 128K of memory. The system used an OEMversion of MS-DOS 2.11, modified to work with its non-standard BIOS andhardware. Simple DOS applications that did not make use of IBM BIOS calls orof lower-level hardware would work.We maxed the memory and added a hard disk.

Plotter and digitiser tablet werescavenged from a previous mini-based CAD system that had failed to flourishin Oz (or anywhere else).The big, big clincher? Gawky and cranky, it came with a slim,concise manual opening the door to automation. Speed didn't matter that muchwhen you're using scripts and LISP to plot automated component assemblydrawings from dimensions passed in from an external database, in fact youneeded all the time to tape a new drawing sheet to the Calcomp 960 and andposition it. Pressurised ballpoint pens eliminated pen disasters.Who else had to patch plotter drivers? Good, clean, harmless fun.Hugh.

Vinyl on a turntable. I'm old.Anyway, I had two machines at that time, one just for that project. I'd get to work about 5:30am and boot that drawing to the view where I was working, then go downstairs for coffee and a bagel. Get back in the office about 6:30am and work the other project (whatever it was). Around lunch I could make the changes to the 'big momma' and run the plot file (another 3-4 hrs.). Get back on the 'other project'.

Sometime around 4:30pm (after everyone else was through plotting for the day) I'd set new pens in the plotter (CalComp 1043A), clean it all up and send the plot (another 2-3 hrs.). IF the plot was clean (big 'IF'), I'd set it out to dry, clean the plotter again, set new pens, then run the night plot sequence. Turn out the lights get home between 8:00pm and 9:00pm.JUST FOR ONE BLEEDIN' PLOT BECAUSE THE CLIENT WANTED. Um.excuse me. Some peeves are still pet.